![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:10 • Filed to: dodge dart | ![]() | ![]() |
Believe it or not, this small tweak bothered me as a little kid. 1972 - front end looked great:
Then the neighbor lady came home with a stripped version of this:
For 1973 - why the ode-to-Pontiac nose? Ruins a nice clean front end design. It's a small thing, but it always bugged me. Any change that bugged you?
![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:21 |
|
Nova 72
73 Nova
Always bothered me
![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:21 |
|
Yeah. That one.
![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:23 |
|
I loved how the Dart was both old-lady and classic muscle... in the same car.
What change bugged me? The untimely death of Pontiac, which was in its ascendancy.
But seriously: 1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse was still hanging on by a very fine thread. Then 2000 hits and it's a... Mini 3000? Complete with shitty Grand-Am-like, uh,
scalloped doors?
1999
2000
![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:23 |
|
That is unfortunate.
![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:29 |
|
And, of course it's not a small change, but the grandaddy of them all:
To this:
![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:30 |
|
Agreed. I can't think of an instance when those doors ever improved a design.
![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:33 |
|
Tucking the bumpers on a '73-'74 is a popular mod
![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:37 |
|
you have every right to be annoyed by that.
Being the Montego Man there is my grille (68-69):
1970: Mercury wat are you doing?!
1972: MERCURY STAHP
![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:44 |
|
my ex's brother has a 74 with tucked bumpers, a fuel injected 427 and a 6 speed. And it is purple. And I love it
![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:47 |
|
I figured you would be in for the 66
vs 67 Beetle headlight change. Gawd I hate that
![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:48 |
|
My '67s a Euro, so '66 lights. No worries.
![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:50 |
|
The scalloped doors were an easy fix on the 3G Eclipse. All that was needed were the doors off of a Dodge Status coupe. Just swap out the glass and the door cards, and you're set.
I wish I could find a picture of a non-riced out one with the doors swapped.
![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:58 |
|
And here's my GM bitch - dad had a '69 Impala - the rear end:
Then, in 1970:
Change for change's sake? Why do this? Uglier.
![]() 11/05/2014 at 16:59 |
|
agreed on that one too. I realized I can go so deep on this just in VW's, not to mention all the mindless changes the domestics did
![]() 11/05/2014 at 17:18 |
|
The refresh of the previous-generation Camry. I thought it looked fine when it debuted despite everyone else lamenting the melted-butter styling, and then they made a slight adjustment by extending the headlights slightly further downward. It's such a stupidly small change, and yet it completely ruined that generation of the Camry in my eyes by making it look melted enough that I just couldn't bring myself to like it.
2007-2008:
2009-2011:
![]() 11/05/2014 at 17:19 |
|
This is a prime example - not only did the car gain weight, the styling got worse! The 1969 front end was understated (for the time) and looked good even w/ 4 headlamps.
![]() 11/05/2014 at 17:20 |
|
That's nothing compared to the war crime that was the 1973 B-body refresh.
1972 Satellite ^^^^ (LOOP BUMPER!!!!)
1973 Satellite. (GAAAAAGG)
![]() 11/05/2014 at 17:21 |
|
Go deep! My project is on hiatus, and I can't watch election results anymore.
![]() 11/05/2014 at 17:22 |
|
Does that count though? The Bigstangs were a whole different generation than the II. Although yes, it is a very drastic change
![]() 11/05/2014 at 17:23 |
|
Agreed - the later car looks more amorphous, less ... like a car.
![]() 11/05/2014 at 17:24 |
|
Probably doesn't count in the context of this discussion. On the other hand, the larger car disappeared, and we left with a misshapen lump to replace what was arguably a classic.
![]() 11/05/2014 at 17:32 |
|
This might be controversial, but I always thought this:
was an improvement on this:
![]() 11/05/2014 at 17:33 |
|
This is very true.
![]() 11/05/2014 at 17:35 |
|
I disagree with this, but really only slightly. I have little love for either of those!
![]() 11/05/2014 at 17:39 |
|
Again, this might be controversial, but I thought the Super Beetle improved on the 'original' offered at the time.
![]() 11/05/2014 at 17:44 |
|
They ride better and have more space in side but they are buy far the ugliest way to own an ACVW, and they're harder to lower like I do with mine.
![]() 11/05/2014 at 17:44 |
|
Chevy ruled the roost in those days when it came to full-size 2 and 4 doors. That 77-forward Impala was nearly every police car. They sold hundreds of thousands of them.
![]() 11/06/2014 at 03:13 |
|
Much love!
![]() 11/06/2014 at 03:14 |
|
Much MEH!
![]() 11/06/2014 at 03:15 |
|
Yeah, I was almost physically sick when I saw the first 74' model.
![]() 11/06/2014 at 09:33 |
|
Yeah the grille is actually one of my favorite features and why I'd never own a 70+ Montego. Which is a shame because I liked the rest of the bodies on them.
But god, the beak kills me. Maybe this was Acura's reference recently?
![]() 11/06/2014 at 10:51 |
|
Thank you. It's a small thing, I know, but I noticed it at the time, even as a little kid.